![]() ![]() The only reason I can think of for them to have these connectors is that they are worried about kids stacking sensors and confusing the control modules. Why even use this connector? Why couldn't they just make an adapted version of the current PF connector with two extra wires? That way, you could have both encoders and backwards compatibility, and stackable connectors. If they indeed use this connector, you can say goodbye to running more than one motor off a port without an adapter cable. If this is the future of the Power Functions system, I am extremely worried. ![]() When I first heard about this, I was hoping, praying that this was just a prototype, but no, its the final system, available for sale. Because of the above, I think several people are going to balk at the new system. Also, you are still limited to 1 motor and 1 sensor per hub. We've also lowered the voltage, so now models will have even worse performance than before. Oh, you already have WeDo 1.0 kits? Too bad, they are not compatible with this new system, at least not without an adapter cable. Everything about this system is baffling, and it seems more like a gimmick than anything. I'm talking about educators, which is what WeDo is aimed at. ![]() This is going to piss off a lot of people. I can't believe that Lego is going with this new, incompatible with anything else connector. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |